Anycubic Photon Printer Owners 造訪社團

I still like having bases, at least for gaming figures. I can understand not wanting them if you are printing people to use in a diorama or model train scene.

Nice prints btw

*bumps table*

The bases help define the actual amount of space a character or creature takes up.

Those are great. Where does one find the stl for "cyber detectives"?

https://www.patreon.com/BombshellMinis

pretty good, wich config did you use?

ahah, nice minis :D

Thanks.

Thanks.

Mike - Yeah, I get that. I was making a different point. ;) These will go on bases. I just texture and flock them separately when painting.

Settings used.

Awesome, thanks.

Miles - These will go on bases. I just texture and flock them separately when painting.

That’s fair, I’m just super lazy and do my bases after painting the model they’re attached to, a bad habit I know but like ?‍♂️

I’d love that owl file if your willing to share mate !

So very true. Too bad 95% are not sculpted that way.

He'll be over in the Bombshell STL web store in April.
https://bombshellminis.com/digital-stl-files/

Even some of the traditional sculpts. ;)

Patrick Keith legend mste

Wow you made them or you downloaded them somewhere?

Bump the table and let's see if they stand

*arm shatters*

Thank up for the links folks. Looks like you have to subscribe to have access to the cyber team file.

Nicholas they will be availabe in the Bombshell web store in April.

Juan I sculpted them and they will be available for download in April.

Look, its the bladerunner and Rachael. ? ?

Where will they be available? Amazing job, hope you can also make the replicants. How long takes you to sculpt a figure like that?

**edited** I just saw you already selected the printer, I think what is in there is correct

-LSD

you know, LSD might be your problem ?

Sorry man I don't know :(

LCD ?

I looked at the backlight without a bath
normal image

Is your FEP loose? It looks like the raft might have been staying stuck to the fep and stretching it up when lifting for a few layers, resulting in an airgap which allowed UV dispersal.

LSD?

That seems like a print made on lsd

Definately light bleed from under the print for whatever reason.

I have 2 printers and I installed a bath from a second printer,
print result is the same

Have you replaced the fep on both baths at some point? Possibly your replacement process is leaving them slightly loose?

Scott Pavlich no, it is a vehicle frame ))

Adam Nock I replaced fep in both baths recently.
tension around 330 MHz as recommended in GitHub

Fair enough. Good luck finding a solution!

i have this last week, just need a firmware upgrade

Is that light support setting ?
If maybe you medium on that with sups running up the back to the top,( you might have already can’t tell from one sided pic)

Been on angle is good but will stop resin pooling inside, besides back support issue I don’t see anything that could off?

Back view

Zoomed in here. How hard is it going to be to get those internal supports off?

The internal supports will probably fuse to the model honestly

That's my worry Michael . Maybe I should flip it over?

Likelihood of success: extremely slim.

Conan Lloyd personally I’d get rid of those supports do the back manually,
That way it’s going now is fine because of the angle of the dangle, they won’t oool resin and shouldn’t have any back support issue aslong as supported from the back

I would try to angle it back more actually. Not totally flat, but angled more. Just to see if that removes the need for internal supports. And I would go heavies all over the back with a raft to make sure the surface area of the print isn't greater than the surface area of the supports

That is a large piece or resen just hanging there. The supports are good my concern whoud be it pulling off the plate with so few. Give it a few main large supports in the center of the peace and a few mid around the edges.

And maybe a few more to fill in the footing just to give you a little more grab on the plate

^^
I normally print around a 40-60 angle depending on its size,
Idk what your running there

Yeah. More supports (heavy) and a raft. The heavier your piece, the more supports you need.

Better? Sorry for all the questions but I'm pretty new to placing supports.

That looks good to me for the edges. Need to get some in the middle of your design, too.

So fill in the top more?

All the blank space needs to be supported.

Conan Lloyd dont feel like you need to cover every space, but maybe a few more on the top half. I normally do a fun design out of supports just to make myself chuckle.

Are those heavies? They look really thin, but maybe I'm not grasping the scale of the model

No they're not heavies. Was getting an idea for placement and coverage then will go back and do the actual setting Michael

Conan Lloyd if that's around 100mm like a gargantuan dnd base, I have success with 10-12 heavies around the outside, and a smiley face in the middle. Maybe add eyebrows to the smiley if I'm extra worried

And obviously support the first few pixels to show up too

Did you use the optimize orientation function?

I'd have to say this is an issue with the file, looks like an aliasing issue like you would see on an FDM printer because the poly count was too low...

Thanks a lot Anders. I have quite a high polygon count.
Here are the properties:
41778858 vertices, 13926286 polygons
STL file is 670MB.

Saturn V?

Correct :D 1/96 ;)
The whole CSM + BPC needs to be replaced ;)

This is the mesh structure

What are you using to model? is everything "closed"? Slicers hate anything that just a surface, if that makes sense? They can get creative with artifacts like that if something is left to interpretation where it starts and stops.

Don't think this is relevant for curved surfaces, unfortunately

Thanks but this is for angeled prints - I need it printed straight vertical ;)

I am using Rhino3D. STLs are checked in Magics and repaired if needed. The "lines" are in fact on four sides of the part where it cross the X and Y axis.
It seems like the very low X,Y resolution but the Chitubox is correctly set up for standard Photon. :(

Check the image below with the angle chart, because that "wall" is on a right angle, you may just be getting aliasing from the LCD as well, photons hate right angles sometimes so it's good to force them to see things as slopes.

Also, this is relevant to layer height, this particular issue is caused by the pixels of the screen.

I get these lines on vertical surfaces too, and wondering what they are. Not just cylinders, but other flat surfaces as well if perpendicular to the lcd.

Lcd pixels. Something in the anti-aliasing isn't working properly.

Alexandr Uhlik is the printer big enough for the bottom sections?
And of course where did you get the STL? I grew up in Houston in 70s and spent a lot time with my rocket model, it was taller than me.

nice!

Why can't you print at 15 degree angle?

Pete Kastner I just do not want to use any supports ;) to have a better surface :D :D :D . I will probably think about it. Thanks ;)

not 100% but i think i heard the original photon doesnt anti alias, maybe the firmware 4.2.19 allows it, or in general does it better.

The new firmware allows for anti aliasing you need to enable it in chitubox. Problem you could be having with your model is some normal's may be reversed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLgD88KFKJI&feature=youtu.be this can be done in meshmixer. The p roblem people have at times with oddball things happening to their meshes can be because of a multitude of reasons. I keep stressing that if you have a mesh it needs to be checked. Things like Netfabb and a multitude of other programs from free to commercial can do that. I think Cura can check meshes as well, I know its for fdm but if you check the mesh you can resave and use with the photon.

Even though a mesh looks watertight in software, which compensates for the way a mesh looks on screen it doesn't mean its ok to print. When you slice in Chitubox take the time to look at the slices and see if you notice any abnormalities. Yes it could be pixels from the LCD, you'd really have to be unlucky. When artists create meshes they look at the monitor, looks ok, release the model. As to how the structure of the model is, well that becomes the users problem. Imagine it this way you have a building with a lovely facade, everything looks perfect on the outside but the frame on the inside is shot, falling apart or cobbled together. Take the extra minutes check your mesh and you will generally never have any issues again unless they are mechanical.

Ray Sears the CSM stack is my own creation. The rest of the rocket is the old Revell kit ?

Alexandr Uhlik nice work

What have you done? Are the failed prints stuck to the bottom or free floating?

Stuck to the bottom... only the initial few layers seem to have printed. It's not the first time. I really do think its my printer. It had a faulty Z screw when I unboxed it and they sent me a new one which was ok for a few weeks then it started print failing again...

i had the some problem in the beginning. Make sure your resin is warm enough, sufficently mixed and have a higher exposure time on the first few layers. I went from 50 to 90. That solved ot for me. Also level the plate again. Maybe that helps

Did you print him at full scale? I loved mine. Took it to show at a trade show and ended up selling it right out the gate. Guy absolutely had to have it. One of my favorite AG prints.

Tim Moulton yup, printed at 100%

Christopher Finlinson nice work. Love the colors.

Nice. What printer did you use? I can't print it at 100 using elegoo mars, the wigs are to large.

Vinícius Dos Reis Costa I was able. To just barely do the wings on my Photon. The tip was still submerged when it was done.

I used the photon s the wings were a tight fit.

Christopher Finlinson searching in the net I found out that mars Is actually 5mm bigger, can you share the configuration that you used?

Well I just rotated it around in the slicer until it fit. Looked like this when I finisdhed.

Christopher Finlinson ty.

I just finished pringing mine with out wings because the wings where cutting it real close to the top of the print limit. I did not want a fail so I did not risk it.

Can you share the STL?

This is a sale item.But thing verse has one thats a lot like mine....kind of. https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3174974